Kenneth R. Howe’s article, "Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die Hard" (1988), challenges the belief that quantitative and qualitative research methods are inherently incompatible. The article questions the long-held belief that quantitative and qualitative research methods are incompatible or fundamentally at odds. Howe advocates for a pragmatic approach to research, where methods are selected based on their effectiveness rather than strict adherence to epistemological paradigms. He argues that both quantitative and qualitative research can be complementary. Howe suggests that both methods share common goals such as generating knowledge and answering important research questions.
One of the key points Howe makes is that both quantitative and qualitative methods share common goals in research, such as generating knowledge and answering important questions. The distinction between the two methods, he argues, is often overemphasized. In practice, the choice of methods depends more on the research question and context than on a rigid dichotomy. Howe suggests that the debate about their incompatibility is unnecessary and even counterproductive. He critiques the "incompatibility thesis" – the belief that the philosophical foundations of these methods; positivism for quantitative, interpretivism for qualitative, make them fundamentally irreconcilable. Instead, Howe promotes the "compatibility thesis," which argues that the two methods can and should be integrated when appropriate.
In discussing mixed methods research, Howe would likely be highly supportive of mixed research methods. He believes that there is no philosophical or practical reason to avoid using both quantitative and qualitative approaches in the same study. According to Howe, "combining quantitative and qualitative methods is a good thing and denies that such a wedding of methods is epistemologically incoherent" (Howe, K., 1988, p. 10). He emphasizes that the goal of research should be to employ the methods that best suit the research questions at hand, rather than adhering to rigid paradigms.
Howe also critiques the notion that paradigms should dictate methods in a one-way fashion, stating that paradigms and methods should inform each other. This two-way relationship allows researchers to evaluate their paradigms based on how well they work in practice. As he writes, "paradigms are evaluated in terms of how well they square with the demands of research practice—and incompatibilism vanishes" (Howe, K., 1988, p. 12).
Howe would support mixed methods research, arguing that combining quantitative and qualitative approaches enhances the research process. His pragmatic perspective emphasizes the flexibility and adaptability of research methods to best address the research objectives. By moving away from the rigid distinction between these methods, researchers can achieve more comprehensive and insightful results.
Reference.
Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017008010
